Vendor list · AI for agriculture & agtech
AI for agriculture, scored on the published rubric.
How we score
Four stages, evidence-graded throughout.
-
Inclusion criteria
Public pricing. Integrations doc. Ten or more customers. Self-serve path.
-
Weighted rubric
Each dimension scored zero to four. Every cell tagged MEASURED, CITED, or ESTIMATED.
-
Total score
Weighted sum out of one hundred. Seven-day right-of-reply window before publishing.
-
Ranked and published
Updated when new vendors qualify or when fact-check replies land corrections.
This cohort's rubric
- Remote-sensing + crop/field intelligence20%
- Farm management + record-keeping15%
- Livestock + animal monitoring10%
- Ease of data integration + accuracy25%
- Sustainability, carbon + traceability10%
- In-field IoT + remote monitoring10%
- Cost economics + time-to-value10%
Inclusion criteria
- Crop & field intelligence: satellite / drone / IoT remote sensing, crop health and yield prediction, pest / disease / weed detection, AI agronomy.
- Farm management: crop and field planning, operations and input recording, compliance, farm accounting and financials.
- Livestock monitoring: animal tracking, health and behavior monitoring, grazing and pasture management, smart tags.
- Sustainability & traceability: carbon / MRV, regenerative ag, natural capital and soil health, supply-chain traceability.
- In-field IoT: deployed sensors and gateways for crop, water, infrastructure, and asset monitoring.
This vendor set is deliberately broad: a livestock-tag vendor does not do crop imagery, and a satellite-analytics vendor ships no field sensors. Each vendor is scored on its actual coverage of every dimension - a dimension a vendor's product category structurally does not address scores zero, not a penalty for missing evidence.
A quick read on the top of the rubric. Each card links into the full scorecard in the next tab.
- 01 Farmers Business Network 55 /100
- 02 AgriWebb 53 /100
- 03 Agworld 49 /100
- 04 Arable 49 /100
- 05 Trinity AgTech 43 /100
- 06 CIBO Technologies 40 /100
- 07 Proagrica 36 /100
- 08 Traction Ag 36 /100
- 09 Ceres Tag 33 /100
- 10 Taranis 33 /100
No platforms match. Try a different term, or clear the search.
01 Farmers Business Network Farmer network + agtech platform (inputs, data, financing). Cross-industry 55 /100
Top strength Broadest coverage in the cohort: field intelligence + seed/network benchmarking, web/mobile record-keeping and reporting, 60+ precision-monitor formats with MyJohnDeere/CNH sync, and quantified MRV via the Gradable JV, on a free-membership model.
Top gap No livestock-animal monitoring or deployed IoT (structural). Core business is a farm-input marketplace + ag-financing/fintech, with the agtech software as a member layer (an internal cohort-fit signal).
Best for Row-crop farmers wanting a free data + benchmarking + record-keeping layer alongside input purchasing, crop marketing, and financing.
02 AgriWebb Livestock management SaaS: tracking, grazing, compliance. Cross-industry 53 /100
Top strength Livestock monitoring (4/4, the cohort's reference) plus a strong farm-management/record-keeping system (3/4): individual/mob tracking, health and performance records, grazing management, compliance/audit reports, and an integration marketplace; published per-head pricing.
Top gap No own crop remote-sensing (0/4) and no deployed IoT hardware (0/4, IoT arrives via third-party marketplace partners). Sustainability is a record-store, not an own quantification engine.
Best for Livestock farmers and ranchers needing animal tracking, grazing management, and compliance records across web and mobile.
03 Agworld Collaborative farm-management platform (grower + agronomist). Cross-industry 49 /100
Top strength Farm management (4/4, the cohort's reference): full collaborative FMS connecting growers, agronomists, and consultants to plan, execute, and record crop production with financials, plus a robust API and named connectors (John Deere, accounting, ag-retail) (3/4 integration).
Top gap No livestock (handled via a separate integration) and no deployed IoT hardware (ingests third-party feeds). Own crop remote-sensing is field mapping/yield analysis, not vendor ML. Pricing quote-only (soft penalty).
Best for Growers, agronomists, and crop consultants who want a shared farm-management record to plan, execute, and analyze crop production collaboratively.
04 Arable In-field IoT sensors + AI crop intelligence (Mark device). Cross-industry 49 /100
Top strength In-field IoT (4/4) and crop intelligence (3/4): the Mark device captures weather, plant, soil, and irrigation data with real-time alerts, feeding ML crop models (spectral indices, ET, GDD, heat stress) validated across a 30+ research-institution network; public API plus Netafim/xarvio integrations.
Top gap No farm-management or livestock scope (structural). Sustainability is water-stewardship only, not soil-carbon MRV. Pricing quote-only (soft penalty).
Best for Growers and agribusinesses needing in-field sensor-driven crop and irrigation intelligence with real-time microclimate data.
05 Trinity AgTech Sandy: soil health, carbon, biodiversity + farm finance. Cross-industry 43 /100
Top strength Sustainability & natural capital (the cohort's raw=3 reference): the Sandy platform quantifies soil carbon (ISO 14064), biodiversity, water quality, provenance certificates, and natural-capital trading in one system, with whole-farm financial optimization; published tiered pricing.
Top gap No own remote-sensing imagery (farmer-data + on-farm models, not satellite/drone ML), no livestock-animal monitoring, and no deployed IoT hardware (software-only). Named-connector breadth is thin.
Best for Farms and estates that want to measure and monetize soil carbon, biodiversity, and natural capital alongside farm financial performance.
06 CIBO Technologies AI ag-sustainability + carbon MRV (SALUS / regenerative). Cross-industry 40 /100
Top strength Sustainability & carbon (4/4, the cohort's reference): Verra-certified SALUS ecosystem-simulation AI for soil-carbon, GHG, and Scope 3 quantification plus carbon credits, with satellite-based crop/land intelligence (3/4), for enterprises.
Top gap No livestock, no deployed IoT (satellite/model only), and no grower farm-management system (program-workflow only). Named-connector/API integration evidence is thin. (CIBO is becoming part of Terion.)
Best for Enterprises and ag-supply-chain players running regenerative-ag, Scope 3, and carbon-credit programs needing quantified MRV.
07 Proagrica Ag supply-chain data connectivity (TELUS Agriculture). Cross-industry 36 /100
Top strength Data integration (3/4): connects agronomic and business data across the agriculture supply chain at scale (27,000+ trading connections, 8,000+ customers), with agronomic workflows and Farmplan farm-software heritage; part of TELUS Agriculture.
Top gap Thin public surface (most product pages did not render). No livestock-animal or deployed-IoT scope (structural); sustainability and crop-ML intelligence are thinly evidenced. Quote-only enterprise pricing (carve-out).
Best for Agribusinesses and ag-retailers needing a neutral data-connectivity layer across agronomic and supply-chain systems.
08 Traction Ag Cloud-native farm accounting + operations (real-time financials). Cross-industry 36 /100
Top strength Farm management & financials (the cohort's reference): deep farm accounting and record-keeping (inventory, production cost, field/entity-level profitability, Schedule F / 1099, multi-entity, accrual) with named connectors to John Deere, Climate FieldView, and financial systems.
Top gap Not a crop-sensing, livestock, IoT, or sustainability tool (all structural absence): it ingests third-party field data for financial analysis, ships no hardware. Pricing quote-only (soft penalty).
Best for Row-crop farm operations and ag-retailers that want farm accounting and field-level profitability tied to actual financials.
09 Ceres Tag Direct-to-satellite GPS smart ear tags for livestock. Cross-industry 33 /100
Top strength Livestock monitoring (4/4) and in-field IoT (4/4): solar, direct-to-satellite smart ear tags deliver continuous individual-animal location, movement, and behavioral (grazing/resting/activity) intelligence with health-anomaly alerts, no towers or battery replacements.
Top gap Single-purpose livestock hardware: no crop intelligence, farm-management, or sustainability quantification (traceability/ESG framing only). Integration is thin (one named partner); pricing is opaque (soft penalty).
Best for Extensive-grazing livestock producers who need continuous, infrastructure-free animal tracking and behavioral health monitoring.
10 Taranis AI leaf-level crop intelligence from drone imagery. Cross-industry 33 /100
Top strength Crop & field intelligence (4/4, the cohort's gold standard): drone-captured submillimeter imagery + deep-learning computer vision on 500M+ data points for leaf-level pest, disease, and weed detection, with a generative-AI agronomy assistant for agronomists and ag retailers.
Top gap Narrow: no livestock, no deployed IoT sensors (drone overflight, not fixed sensors), and thin open-integration / farm-management evidence. Pricing quote-only (soft penalty).
Best for Agronomists and ag retailers needing leaf-level AI crop scouting (pest/disease/weed) across large acreage.
11 Farmbot IoT remote monitoring for farm water + infrastructure (AU). Cross-industry 16 /100
Top strength In-field IoT (4/4): satellite/solar-connected sensors for water tanks, dams, pumps, diesel, and rainfall with threshold/anomaly alerts and remote pump actuation, purpose-built for remote Australian farms (8,000-10,000 farm references).
Top gap Very narrow: no crop intelligence, farm-management, livestock-animal, or sustainability scope (it monitors water/fuel infrastructure, not crops or animals). Integration is device-to-app only; pricing quote-only (soft penalty).
Best for Australian and remote-property farmers who need reliable off-grid monitoring of water, fuel, and infrastructure assets with anomaly alerts.
Request a platform we should evaluate.
The vendor list is intentionally constrained. We only score vendors that meet the inclusion criteria documented above. If you use a platform that fits and isn't here, send it our way. We evaluate on the same rubric and email you when the score is published.
Don't see a platform?
Tell us what to score next.
The vendor list grows from buyer requests. If you use a platform that fits the inclusion criteria and isn't here, send it our way through the Request a platform tab above. We evaluate on the same rubric and email you when the score is published.
Or read more about how we score / take the audit
Take the free 4-minute readiness audit.
Get your score, peer benchmarks, and three tailored vendor recommendations. No email required to see your results.