Vendor list · AI recruiting tools
AI recruiting tools, scored.
How we score
Four stages, evidence-graded throughout.
-
Inclusion criteria
Public pricing. Integrations doc. Ten or more customers. Self-serve path.
-
Weighted rubric
Each dimension scored zero to four. Every cell tagged MEASURED, CITED, or ESTIMATED.
-
Total score
Weighted sum out of one hundred. Seven-day right-of-reply window before publishing.
-
Ranked and published
Updated when new vendors qualify or when fact-check replies land corrections.
A quick read on the top of the rubric. Each card links into the full scorecard in the next tab.
- 01 Eightfold AI Talent intelligence platform 66 /100
- 02 Bullhorn Staffing-agency ATS with copilot 63 /100
- 03 HireVue Video interview AI 61 /100
- 04 LinkedIn Recruiter Sourcing network with AI assistant 61 /100
- 05 Beamery Talent CRM + skills platform 59 /100
- 06 Greenhouse Structured-hiring ATS 58 /100
- 07 Paradox Conversational hourly hiring 58 /100
- 08 Findem AI talent-data sourcing 54 /100
- 09 SmartRecruiters Mid-market AI-native ATS 52 /100
- 10 Metaview AI interview notetaker 47 /100
No platforms match. Try a different term, or clear the search.
01 Workable Workable Cross-industry 75 /100
Top strength All-in-one ATS pairing a 400M+ profile database with an autonomous Agent for sourcing, screening, and outreach; 30,000+ customers, transparent pricing, and Forbes 2025 Best AI-Powered Recruiting Platform.
Top gap Evidence is almost entirely vendor-claimed, with independent customer outcomes, third-party usability ratings, and headcount all [UNKNOWN].
Best for Mid-market teams seeking an all-in-one ATS with built-in AI sourcing, published per-seat pricing, and rapid deployment.
02 Eightfold AI Eightfold AI Cross-industry 71 /100
Top strength Top sourcing score 4/4: a deep-learning model trained on a billion-plus-profile dataset that infers candidate skills rather than keyword-matching. ai_native_score 75; total 71/100.
Top gap An active FCRA class action alleging the match score operates as an undisclosed consumer report caps compliance at 3/4; setup and cost score 2/4.
Best for Global enterprises (10,000+ employees) on Workday, SAP SuccessFactors or Oracle needing an AI skills-matching and internal-mobility overlay with OFCCP/LL144 requirements.
04 Bullhorn Enterprise suite Bullhorn Cross-industry 68 /100
Top strength Top data-integration score 4/4: a 300+ pre-integrated partner marketplace plus native LinkedIn Recruiter System Connect. 10,000+ customers, 1.3 million workers paid monthly.
Top gap Soft cohort-fit penalty: built for staffing agencies, not in-house corporate recruiting; UI scored 2/4 as dated and cluttered.
Best for Staffing and recruitment agencies needing a single front-to-back-office operating system with deep partner ecosystem and SMB-accessible entry pricing.
05 Ashby Ashby Cross-industry 66 /100
Top strength Scores 3/4 on six of seven dimensions; over 4,400 customers including Shopify and Snowflake, 250+ integrations, and a published Foundations tier at $400/month. Total 66/100.
Top gap Compliance scores lowest at 2/4: SOC 2 Type 2 only, with no independent bias audit published.
Best for Mid-market and scaling startups wanting a unified ATS, sourcing, scheduling and analytics with rapid implementation.
06 Gem Gem Cross-industry 66 /100
Top strength All-in-one sourcing, CRM and ATS with an 800M+ profile sourcing database, AI agents, native connectors to 5+ ATSes, and annual BABL third-party bias audits. 1,200+ customers, G2 4.8/5.
Top gap Evidence is almost entirely vendor-claimed; independent third-party verification of outcomes is absent, and cost economics scores 2/4 (quote-only Growth/Enterprise).
Best for Mid-market to enterprise teams seeking an all-in-one sourcing and engagement platform with strong AI automation and ATS connectivity.
07 HireVue HireVue Cross-industry 66 /100
Top strength Scores highest (4/4) on data integration: certified ATS/HRIS partner tiers (Workday Select 140+ live customers, Oracle Gold 100+, SAP Silver 50), the cohort reference for integration breadth. 80M+ global interviews.
Top gap Compliance held at 3/4 by an unresolved March 2025 ACLU ADA/EEOC complaint naming the AI video platform; setup runs 6 to 12 weeks.
Best for Large-enterprise and high-volume hiring teams running inbound screening at scale on a certified-partner ATS (Workday, Oracle, SAP), including FedRAMP-grade compliance needs.
08 LinkedIn Recruiter LinkedIn Recruiter Cross-industry 66 /100
Top strength Scores 4/4 on sourcing and matching: a 1B+ member professional network plus an agentic Hiring Assistant, with vendor-cited data showing recruiters review 81% fewer profiles per qualified match.
Top gap Compliance held at 2/4: no published independent third-party AI bias audit under NYC LL144 for Hiring Assistant or AI-Assisted Search; Recruiter Corporate pricing is quote-only.
Best for Mid-market-to-enterprise TA teams whose primary bottleneck is sourcing reach, already running an RSC-partner ATS (Greenhouse, Workday, Lever, iCIMS, SmartRecruiters, Bullhorn).
09 Willo Willo Cross-industry 66 /100
Top strength Async video interviewing with published per-month pricing (Growth $279, Scale $409), native connectors to 25+ ATS, compliance covering ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II, and a stated 68 NPS.
Top gap Scale penalty applied for a small headcount target (25) and roughly $9M total funding indicating mid-market-only focus.
Best for Mid-market teams running high-volume structured async video screening that want published per-month pricing and native ATS connectors without enterprise contract complexity.
10 Beamery Beamery Cross-industry 64 /100
Top strength Top compliance score 4/4: ISO 42001 AI-management certification plus an independent Warden AI bias audit (36 Clear, sample 25,996) and NYC LL144 documentation. Named customers include Salesforce and Wells Fargo.
Top gap Cost economics and setup both score 1/4: zero published pricing (/pricing 404s) and value gated on a multi-week certified ATS integration.
Best for Large enterprises on Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, Greenhouse or SmartRecruiters wanting an AI talent CRM with audited responsible-AI compliance.
11 Greenhouse Greenhouse Cross-industry 63 /100
Top strength Top compliance score 4/4: ISO 42001:2023 certification, independent monthly Warden AI bias audit across ten protected classes, and documented NYC LL144 alignment. 400+ integrations; named customers DoorDash, Betterment, MLB.
Top gap Sourcing scores 2/4: Talent Matching is an inbound-pipeline filter, not an outbound candidate-sourcing graph; pricing is quote-only.
Best for In-house corporate TA teams wanting a structured-hiring ATS with strong compliance posture and a broad integration ecosystem, especially under NYC LL144 or Colorado SB205.
12 Paradox Paradox Cross-industry 63 /100
Top strength Cohort reference for candidate engagement (4/4): Olivia conducts screening, messaging, and scheduling autonomously across 100+ languages, with Chipotle time-to-hire dropping from 12 days to four. Acquired by Workday (Oct 1, 2025).
Top gap Sourcing held at 2/4 because Olivia is inbound-only with no outbound or passive-candidate reach; compliance 2/4 (no published bias audit) and pricing is quote-only.
Best for Mid-market-to-enterprise employers running high-volume, frontline, or hourly hiring on a major enterprise ATS who need to automate screening, scheduling, and communication at scale.
03 SeekOut AI talent sourcing on a 1B+ profile graph: candidate search across external sources and the ATS, plus bias-audit and diversity analytics. Cross-industry 71 /100
Top strength Scores 61/100. Sourcing reach scores 3/4 on a 1B+ profile graph with context-aware AI search across external sources and the ATS, 30+ filters, and applicant rediscovery; compliance also scores 3/4 with dated third-party bias audits and ISO 42001 governance, and a published...
Top gap Candidate-engagement automation scores 2/4: multi-touch outreach is recruiter-configured rather than a fully autonomous candidate-facing agent. UI heuristics are [UNKNOWN], with no independent G2 or Capterra usability review available to score.
Best for Mid-market talent-acquisition teams needing unified search across 1B+ public profiles and their ATS, with a visible entry price and documented ATS connectors.
13 Pinpoint Pinpoint Cross-industry 59 /100
Top strength Early ISO 42001 certification (October 21, 2025) for AI governance, alongside SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, anonymized AI screening, and 100+ native integrations including Workday, Oracle HCM, and SAP.
Top gap Cost economics 1/4 (quote-only, /pricing 404, no published amounts); identity evidence is thin (founding year, HQ, investors all UNKNOWN) and no independent bias audit is published.
Best for Mid-market and enterprise teams seeking a single modern ATS consolidating careers site, CRM, scheduling, onboarding, and reporting with responsible-AI controls.
14 Sense Sense Cross-industry 59 /100
Top strength Conversational candidate engagement across SMS, WhatsApp, chat, email, and Voice AI, scoring 3/4 on five of seven dimensions, with Warden Verified status (Jan 2026) and a 4.5/5 G2 rating.
Top gap No published pricing at any tier and no documented implementation timeline, drawing a soft pricing penalty; total score 59/100.
Best for High-volume staffing agencies and enterprise TA teams adding SMS, WhatsApp, and Voice AI automation onto an existing ATS via a vendor-led implementation.
16 Vervoe Vervoe Cross-industry 59 /100
Top strength AI-graded skills assessment with documented compliance: ISO 27001, a Holistic AI bias audit, NYC LL144, GDPR, and EEOC/OFCCP alignment, plus native integrations across 16 ATS platforms.
Top gap Pricing is fully quote-only with no published amounts (cost scores 1/4), and post-2018 funding and headcount are [UNKNOWN]; total score 59/100.
Best for Mid-market and enterprise teams wanting skills-based assessment and AI screening on an existing ATS, where bias-audit documentation and rapid deployment matter.
18 Findem Findem Cross-industry 54 /100
Top strength 800M-profile 3D-data graph with natural-language search (Fia copilot). Monthly Warden AI third-party bias audits (44,072 samples, 'Clear' across 11 protected classes). G2 4.7/5. Named enterprise: Adobe, Box, Medallia, Nutanix, RingCentral, Cohesity, Paychex, Insight Partners....
Top gap Bullhorn and Oracle HCM absent from integrations. Underlying LLM provider not named. ISO 42001 not held (Eightfold + Beamery do). No public pricing. Unresolved February 2026 privacy-clarification event.
Best for Mid-market to enterprise TA teams wanting AI-native attribute-based sourcing and an independent bias-audit posture, on Greenhouse, Workday, Lever, iCIMS, SAP or Ashby.
20 iCIMS iCIMS Cross-industry 52 /100
Top strength Scores highest (4/4) on data integration with the deepest surface in the cohort: 10,000+ total integrations activated, 800+ prebuilt, native ADP/Infor/Microsoft/UKG. 4,400+ companies, a quarter of the Fortune 500.
Top gap Cost economics scores 1/4: /pricing returns 404, only contact-sales CTAs; setup runs 3 to 6 months (6 to 12 for large orgs).
Best for Large and mid-market enterprises wanting a configurable ATS with the broadest HCM-integration ecosystem, able to absorb a multi-month implementation and quote-only procurement.
22 Metaview Metaview Cross-industry 52 /100
Top strength Best-of-breed AI interview-intelligence vendor for in-house TA running an existing ATS. $50/seat Pro tier unlocks scorecard autofill across 50+ ATS connectors. GV led $35M Series B June 2025. Named outcomes: Workleap 50% screening reduction, Elara Caring 50% recruiter time...
Top gap Non-English / multi-hour transcription degradation flagged by 2026 independent review (Stops taking notes in multi-hour interviews). Underlying LLM not named. Model-training opt-out default undocumented. ISO 27001 / ISO 42001 / EU AI Act readiness absent.
Best for In-house TA teams already running Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, or Workday that want AI interview notes, application review, and lightweight sourcing as a layer on their existing stack.
15 SmartRecruiters SmartRecruiters Cross-industry 59 /100
Top strength Full-stack SAP-owned AI-native ATS serving 4,000+ organizations across 120+ countries, with named customers Amazon, Visa, and McDonald's and native SAP SuccessFactors integration.
Top gap No independent AI bias audit, ISO 42001, or NYC LL144 documentation, and setup time is [UNKNOWN]; total score 52/100.
Best for Mid-market to large enterprises with high-volume corporate hiring, especially those on or moving toward the SAP SuccessFactors HCM stack.
17 Phenom Phenom Cross-industry 57 /100
Top strength AI-architected enterprise TXM suite (ai_native_score 75) with a strong compliance stack (3/4): ISO 27001:2022, 27017/27018/27701, SOC 2 Type II, UK Cyber Essentials Plus, GDPR. 500+ global brands including Southwest, DHL, Adobe, Mars.
Top gap Setup time scores 1/4 as the cohort's named floor anchor (multi-month, multi-module onboarding); cost economics 1/4 (RFP-only, zero published amounts) and UI heuristics is UNKNOWN.
Best for Large multinational enterprises (roughly $250M+ revenue) running high-volume lifecycle hiring who want one AI-driven talent-experience platform and can absorb a multi-month implementation.
19 Workday Recruiting Enterprise suite Workday Recruiting Cross-industry 54 /100
Top strength Recruiting module of the Workday HCM suite, named a Leader in the 2026 Gartner Magic Quadrant, with ISO 42001 covering Talent Management and SOC 2 Type II on HiredScore AI; Paradox-powered agent schedules tens of millions of interviews yearly.
Top gap Moderate cohort-fit penalty as an HCM module rather than standalone ATS, with no published pricing and setup time [UNKNOWN]; total score 42/100.
Best for Enterprises already on or committing to Workday HCM that want recruiting, AI candidate grading, and conversational engagement inside that suite with enterprise-grade compliance.
23 Crosschq Crosschq Cross-industry 49 /100
Top strength Reference checks + Quality-of-Hire analytics + AI screening + fraud defense + ID verification + Traitify-acquired behavioral assessments. Enterprise customer roster: Google, Deloitte, Samsung, HubSpot, Pinterest, WPP, Dish, ADT, NBA, Olympics. 3.8M-hire Brilliant 500 dataset....
Top gap trust.crosschq.com returned 403 (SOC 2 Type II date / ISO 27001 / ISO 42001 / NYC LL 144 / EU AI Act readiness unverifiable). /pricing returns 404; only third-party $399/month aggregator anchor available. Q4 model card and ApplicantX 11.7%-fraud methodology lack published...
Best for Mid-market and up TA teams already running a major ATS who want AI screening, fraud detection and Quality-of-Hire analytics on top of it.
24 PageUp PageUp Cross-industry 49 /100
Top strength End-to-end enterprise talent suite (ATS, recruitment-marketing CRM, onboarding, analytics, learning) with a credible compliance posture (3/4): ISO/IEC 27001:2022 audited twice yearly, ISO 31000, TX-RAMP Level 2, plus a Workday Design Approved certified integration.
Top gap Cost economics 1/4 (fully quote-only) and most AI/integration-depth claims are headline-only; certified integration depth is documented for Workday alone.
Best for Enterprise and mid-market organizations in higher education, government, healthcare, and retail wanting a single unified ATS plus recruitment-marketing plus onboarding suite with Workday adjacency.
25 Maki Maki Cross-industry 47 /100
Top strength Paris-based 5-agent AI assessment platform. $28.6M Series A January 2025. 80+ named Fortune-2000 customers: BNP Paribas, Capgemini, Deloitte, ASOS, H&M, Hudson Talent Solutions RPO. 40+ ATS connectors (Greenhouse, Workday, iCIMS, SuccessFactors, Bullhorn, Lever covered)....
Top gap No downloadable NYC LL 144 bias-audit PDF (HireVue publishes annual third-party audits). Underlying orchestrating LLM not disclosed (only TTS/voice subprocessors). No ISO 42001. No SOC 2 Type II date. Zero pricing transparency. Founding-year contradiction (2021 per Crunchbase vs...
Best for Mid-market-to-enterprise talent teams ($100M+ revenue) already running iCIMS, Workday, or SAP SuccessFactors that want a science-backed AI screening and assessment layer.
26 Karat Karat Cross-industry 44 /100
Top strength Conducts technical interviews at scale: 600k+ technical interviews conducted, used by 7 of the 25 largest public companies, SOC 2 Type II, with a claimed 50% time-to-hire reduction.
Top gap Integration penalty applied: only Workday is documented, with Greenhouse/Lever/iCIMS/SmartRecruiters integrations unknown; pricing is quote-only via 404 pages.
Best for Enterprise technical hiring teams seeking standardized interviews with 24/7 availability and benchmarking against large interview datasets.
30 Fetcher Fetcher Cross-industry 35 /100
Top strength Honest mid-market sourcing-as-a-service. Hybrid AI+human candidate batches. Published per-seat prices. 20+ Merge-mediated ATS connectors (Workday, Greenhouse, iCIMS, Bullhorn, Oracle Fusion covered).
Top gap Hard annual sourcing caps (500 / 1,000 / 2,000+) and applicant-review caps (2,500 / 5,000 / 10,000+) with no soft overage - upgrade or stop sourcing. Email-only candidate engagement with recurrent deliverability complaints. SuccessFactors missing. Two-way sync depth only on...
Best for SMB and lower-mid-market in-house recruiting teams wanting to outsource outbound sourcing to an AI-plus-human service whose hiring volume stays under the tier caps.
27 HireEZ HireEZ Cross-industry 42 /100
Top strength Strongest pure-play AI-sourcing engine for staffing, RPO, and high-external-volume in-house recruiting. Customer-success page concentrates 9 of 11 flagship cases in those segments. G2 sub-scores lead Beamery 9.4 vs 7.9 on Sourcing and Candidate Identification. Native ATS...
Top gap Total pricing opacity (no public price; /new-pricing/ redirects to contact-sales; Vendr median contract $13K/year with documented 2-3x annual escalations). ~26% headcount reduction Oct 2023->Dec 2024 visible in third-party trackers; no public acknowledgment. Underlying AI model...
Best for In-house TA, RPO and staffing teams needing high-volume external sourcing and AI outreach on top of an existing ATS (Workday, Greenhouse or Lever).
21 Lever Lever Cross-industry 52 /100
Top strength Pairs an ATS with a built-in talent CRM (LeverTRM) for engagement automation (3/4): personalized nurture campaigns, self-service scheduling, and one-click posting to 200+ job boards across a marketplace of named HRIS/sourcing/assessment partners.
Top gap Lowest in the set at 34/100; cost economics 1/4 (quote-only, no dollar amounts), and setup time plus UI heuristics both resolve to UNKNOWN on thin evidence.
Best for SMB-to-mid-market in-house recruiting teams wanting a combined ATS plus talent CRM with nurture automation and broad job-board distribution, not outbound sourcing.
31 Talentis Talentis Cross-industry 34 /100
Top strength Proprietary TalentGraph index of roughly 800M public profiles with built-in OpenAI and Perplexity AI search, scoring 3/4 on sourcing; Trustpilot 4.9/5 across 909 reviews.
Top gap Hard integration penalty (Microsoft Word/Outlook add-ins only, no cohort-anchor ATS connectors) plus a scale penalty for boutique-only positioning; total score 29/100.
Best for Boutique and mid-size retained executive search firms (roughly 1 to 50 users) wanting a large sourcing graph and a Microsoft-native CRM workflow.
29 Neuroscale AI AI-native recruiting platform (Arbi) with autonomous agents for sourcing, outreach, and screening Cross-industry 36 /100
Top strength Names five cohort-anchor ATS connectors (Greenhouse, Ashby, Lever, Bullhorn, Workday) plus a 50+ ATS headline (data integration 3/4), positioned as an AI-native platform built around autonomous sourcing/screening agents over a claimed 900M+ profile graph.
Top gap Evidence is almost entirely vendor-claimed on a JS-rendered single-page site, with no third-party verification of sourcing reach, engagement outcomes, or compliance; pricing is quote-only (cost 1/4), and setup_time and ui_heuristics are [UNKNOWN].
Best for In-house talent-acquisition teams that want AI-agent-driven sourcing and multi-channel outreach across a large candidate graph and already run a mainstream ATS (Greenhouse, Ashby, Lever, Bullhorn, Workday).
32 Untapped Untapped Cross-industry 27 /100
Top strength Campus / early-career-recruiting marketplace with deep self-reported-demographic filtering. ~1M early-career candidate pool with 50,000+ placements over 6 years. Native connectors to Workday, Greenhouse, Lever.
Top gap Vendor explicitly does not market AI capability - TechCrunch 2021 stated the platform 'does not rely on AI'. Cohort weights AI matching + disclosed-model+benchmarks + engagement automation at 47.5% combined. Two third-party aggregators (SelectHub, Slashdot) insert 'AI-Powered...
Best for Mid-market to enterprise employers running early-career, campus, or intern programs on Workday, Greenhouse, Lever, or iCIMS who want wider Gen Z reach and DEI pipeline reporting.
28 Plum Plum Cross-industry 41 /100
Top strength Psychometric pre-hire assessment tool. Big Five model with 40,000-job Role Model library. Nucleus-validated Scotiabank case (182% ROI in 7 months). Named customers: Scotiabank campus, Whirlpool interns, Hyundai, SAP, Bloomberg, Deloitte. 1M+ assessment completions; 92%...
Top gap Phenom acquired April 28, 2026 - standalone roadmap uncertain. Workday and Bullhorn API-only; Oracle HCM not listed. Greenhouse 'Plus' tier required on customer side. Pricing unit at $750/month floor undocumented. SOC 2 Type II / ISO 27001 / ISO 42001 posture not publicly...
Best for High-volume early-career and campus hiring programs wanting a fair pre-interview behavioral screen layered on an existing ATS, not a sourcing or engagement tool.
A different vendor list?
Tell us what to score next.
Yardstick is a buyer's-guide firm. AI sales, AI customer experience, AI customer success, AI call-center, AI recruiting, AI BD/partnerships, AI tax, AI ERP, and AI social-media-marketing tools are live. If your category is next, send the request and we'll evaluate fit against the methodology.
Take the free 4-minute readiness audit.
Get your score, peer benchmarks, and three tailored vendor recommendations. No email required to see your results.