Vendor list · workflow automation & iPaaS
Workflow automation and iPaaS platforms, scored on the published rubric.
How we score
Four stages, evidence-graded throughout.
-
Inclusion criteria
Public pricing. Integrations doc. Ten or more customers. Self-serve path.
-
Weighted rubric
Each dimension scored zero to four. Every cell tagged MEASURED, CITED, or ESTIMATED.
-
Total score
Weighted sum out of one hundred. Seven-day right-of-reply window before publishing.
-
Ranked and published
Updated when new vendors qualify or when fact-check replies land corrections.
This cohort's rubric
- Connector breadth20%
- AI-agent + orchestration capability18%
- Build experience (no/low-code)16%
- Reliability + observability14%
- Governance + security12%
- Pricing + scalability10%
- Time-to-value10%
Inclusion criteria
- Integration breadth: thousands of pre-built app connectors plus a generic API path for custom integrations.
- AI agents & orchestration: AI agents that plan and execute multi-step workflows with tool use and LLM orchestration.
- No/low-code build: a visual builder non-developers ship with, plus a code path for power users.
- Reliability & governance: error handling, retries, run logs, monitoring, and enterprise governance (RBAC, SSO, audit).
This set spans SMB self-serve automation, enterprise orchestration, and AI-native iPaaS. Each vendor is scored on its actual evidence per dimension - a capability a product structurally lacks scores zero, not a penalty for missing evidence.
A quick read on the top of the rubric. Each card links into the full scorecard in the next tab.
No platforms match. Try a different term, or clear the search.
01 Make Visual AI automation and iPaaS platform connecting 3,000+ apps Cross-industry 96 /100
Top strength Cohort-leading connector breadth (3,500+ apps plus HTTP/custom apps) behind a best-in-class visual no-code builder, with enterprise governance (SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, SSO, RBAC, audit logs) and transparent published pricing.
Top gap AI agents and MCP server are still in beta; no standalone funding/valuation, named leadership, or revenue-band evidence on the public surface.
Best for Teams that want a visual no-code automation platform with thousands of connectors, published per-tier pricing, and enterprise security controls, from SMB self-serve to enterprise.
02 Zapier No-code automation and AI orchestration across 9,000+ apps Cross-industry 89 /100
Top strength Cohort-leading connector breadth (9,000+ apps, 66,000+ triggers/actions, generic webhooks and a Workflow API) with near-instant self-serve time-to-value and transparent free-to-paid pricing; 3.4M businesses and 69% of the Fortune 1000.
Top gap AI agents are a first-class surface but sit atop a deterministic 2012-era workflow engine; no public quantified uptime SLA or ISO 27001/HIPAA disclosure was findable in frozen sources.
Best for Teams needing thousands of pre-built connectors, rapid no-code automation, and enterprise-grade governance with transparent pricing from a free tier upward.
03 Boomi Cross-industry 87 /100
Top strength AI-agent capability, build experience, and governance are the top dimensions: Agentstudio and Platform Agents with MCP support and a claimed 90,000+ enterprise agents in production, no-code tooling with the Flow builder and Boomi Suggest, and FedRAMP Moderate, SOC 1/2, ISO, HIPAA, and PCI DSS attestations over 1,000+ application connectors.
Top gap Founding year, headcount, and revenue are not documented publicly; the iPaaS core predates the LLM era with AI capabilities added on top; uptime (99.99%) and agent-count figures are vendor-claimed; and enterprise tiers are quote-only above the published $99/month pay-as-you-go entry.
Best for Enterprise organizations (30,000+ customers per the vendor) needing governed AI-agent orchestration and compliance-heavy iPaaS reach across 1,000+ applications.
04 Tray.ai Enterprise orchestration platform for data and AI: agents, MCP governance, and 700+ connector iPaaS Cross-industry 81 /100
Top strength First-class AI-agent orchestration (Merlin Agent Builder + Agent Gateway for MCP) on a governed enterprise iPaaS with 700+ connectors, SOC 1/SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR/CCPA/HIPAA, US/EU/APAC data residency, and 100% execution-uptime claims at 150B+ integrations/year scale.
Top gap No public dollar pricing on any tier (all route to demo/sales) and no published founding year, funding, HQ, or quantified uptime SLA in frozen sources.
Best for Enterprise teams needing governed AI-agent orchestration alongside workflow automation and integration at production scale.
05 UiPath Cross-industry 80 /100
Top strength AI-agent and orchestration capability is the top dimension: Maestro coordinates AI agents, robots, and people across long-running adaptive processes, with curated connectors to Salesforce, Workday, Microsoft, SAP, ServiceNow, and Snowflake, FedRAMP Moderate authorization listed on the FedRAMP marketplace, and a published $25/month entry tier.
Top gap No dimension beyond agent orchestration reaches top marks; ISO 27001 status, the exact connector-catalog count, funding, and headcount are not documented publicly; and governance evidence beyond FedRAMP Moderate is thin on the public surface.
Best for Enterprise teams (10,800+ customers per the vendor) needing durable orchestration of AI agents, robots, and people with compliance controls across low-code and pro-code build paths.
06 Refold AI AI-native integration agents that design, deploy and self-heal enterprise integrations Cross-industry 77 /100
Top strength First-class autonomous integration agents (memory graphs, schema-drift handling, self-healing, MCP orchestration) over 1250+ enterprise connectors, with SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, RBAC, SSO and named enterprise references (Incorta, Kantata, OvationCXM, Naehas).
Top gap Pricing is quote-only with no published tiers (demo-request only); build UX is agent-driven and developer-leaning rather than a visual no-code canvas; seed-stage with no published SLA, headcount, or third-party audit reports.
Best for Enterprise software teams and professional-services orgs that need AI-native integration agents for complex systems of record (SAP, Oracle, Workday) where autonomous workflow creation, self-healing and rapid deployment matter more than SMB self-serve visual building.
07 Appian Cross-industry 65 /100
Top strength Build experience and governance are the top dimensions: no-code and low-code development with drag-and-drop and natural-language app generation, backed by SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP High, HIPAA, and ISO 27001 attestations, a 99.95% uptime claim, and an 8-week delivery guarantee.
Top gap Connector breadth is the weakest dimension (13 named templates plus OpenAPI and an SDK), and previously published per-user dollar pricing ($60 and $18 per user/month in 2020) is now quote-only with tiers but no dollar figures, a de-publication that carries a hard pricing-transparency penalty; headcount and revenue are not documented publicly.
Best for Large enterprises and public-sector organizations needing governed, auditable workflow automation with embedded AI agents under FedRAMP High controls.
08 Nintex Cross-industry 61 /100
Top strength AI-agent capability, build experience, and time-to-value are the strongest dimensions: agentic AI for decisions and workflow orchestration, low-code visual designers accessible to citizen developers, template-driven rollout, and on-premises deployment including AI and identity management for Nintex K2.
Top gap Connector breadth centers on Microsoft, Salesforce, and SAP; no SOC 2, ISO, or FedRAMP attestations, uptime SLA, or status page are documented publicly; and previously published annual tier pricing (from $25,000, January 2024) is now quote-only, a de-publication that carries a hard pricing-transparency penalty.
Best for Enterprise teams (7,000+ organizations per the vendor) needing governed, on-premises-capable workflow automation with Microsoft, Salesforce, and SAP depth.
Request a platform we should evaluate.
The vendor list is intentionally constrained. We only score vendors that meet the inclusion criteria documented above. If you use a platform that fits and isn't here, send it our way. We evaluate on the same rubric and email you when the score is published.
Don't see a platform?
Tell us what to score next.
The vendor list grows from buyer requests. If you use a platform that fits the inclusion criteria and isn't here, send it our way through the Request a platform tab above. We evaluate on the same rubric and email you when the score is published.
Or read more about how we score / take the audit
Take the free 4-minute readiness audit.
Get your score, peer benchmarks, and three tailored vendor recommendations. No email required to see your results.