Yardstick Research tear-sheet / healthcare clinical cohort

Methodology · how we score · rubric weights in plain sight · vendors received this sheet seven days before publication and could flag factual errors, never rankings

Deepscribe

Identity

Total score: 78.75 / 100

Headline numbers

Metric Value Evidence
Free tier? none - sales-led enterprise + group-practice procurement [VENDOR-CLAIMED - https://www.deepscribe.ai/]
Cheapest tier (estimated) ~$350/provider/month (no EHR integration) [THIRD-PARTY ESTIMATE - https://softwarefinder.com/emr-software/deepscribe/pricing]
Full-suite tier (estimated) ~$500-$750/provider/month (with EHR + full feature mix) [THIRD-PARTY ESTIMATE - https://www.healos.ai/blog/deepscribe-pricing-features-cost-and-the-best-alternatives-in-2025]
Underlying LLM Proprietary "HealAI" (trained on 3M+ labeled clinical conversations); GPT-4 invoked via prompt engineering as adjunct [VENDOR-CLAIMED - https://www.deepscribe.ai/resources/deepscribe-outperforms-gpt-4-by-59-percent-on-ai-medical-scribing]
Published clinical-task accuracy +59% vs GPT-4 on vendor-internal medical-scribing benchmark; oncology: +16% diagnoses/visit, +22% comorbidity capture, +45% SDOH capture, +17% ICD-10-to-E/M linkage, +21% ICD-10 specificity [VENDOR-CLAIMED - https://www.deepscribe.ai/resources/deepscribe-outperforms-gpt-4-by-59-percent-on-ai-medical-scribing, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/deepscribe-solidifies-ambient-ai-leadership-in-oncology-with-new-study-and-accelerated-growth-302557045.html]
Customer count 1,500+ healthcare organizations (Ambient OS); 2,800+ clinics & health systems served [VENDOR-CLAIMED - https://www.deepscribe.ai/about]
Named customers Ochsner Health (4,700 clinicians), Texas Oncology, Covenant Healthcare, Pearl Health, Privia, Priority Health, Commons Clinic, MedCura Health, USON, AON, OneOncology, OnCare, SCRI, CARTI [VENDOR-CLAIMED - https://www.deepscribe.ai/, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/deepscribe-solidifies-ambient-ai-leadership-in-oncology-with-new-study-and-accelerated-growth-302557045.html]
Annual visit volume ~8M visits captured cumulatively; ~5M oncology visits/year (vendor claim); on track for 3.1M cancer-care visits/year (Sept 2025 milestone) [VENDOR-CLAIMED - https://www.deepscribe.ai/, https://www.deepscribe.ai/about]
KLAS standing Emerging Company Spotlight: 98.8/100 overall performance, A+ all six categories [VENDOR-CLAIMED + THIRD-PARTY - https://www.ehrsource.com/articles/ambient-ai-scribes-comparison/]
Note satisfaction (vendor) 99.92% [VENDOR-CLAIMED - https://www.deepscribe.ai/about]
Charts closed within 1.6 minutes [VENDOR-CLAIMED - https://www.ehrsource.com/articles/ambient-ai-scribes-comparison/]

Dimension scores

Dimension Score Weight Weighted Evidence
Clinical accuracy + safety 3/4 20 15.00 [VENDOR-CLAIMED] KLAS 98.8 overall + A+ all six categories - https://www.ehrsource.com/articles/ambient-ai-scribes-comparison/. Vendor oncology study (Sept 2025): +16% diagnoses, +22% comorbidity capture, +45% SDOH, +17% E/M linkage, +21% ICD-10 specificity - https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/deepscribe-solidifies-ambient-ai-leadership-in-oncology-with-new-study-and-accelerated-growth-302557045.html. DeepScore + "+59% vs GPT-4" benchmarks are vendor-internal. Gap to 4/4: no DeepScribe-specific peer-reviewed validation (NEJM AI / JAMA Network Open / npj Digital Medicine); no published hallucination rate with methodology. (deepscribe.md §Dimension 1)
EHR integration depth 3/4 15 11.25 [VENDOR-CLAIMED] Epic, Athenahealth, eClinicalWorks named - https://www.deepscribe.ai/. Oncology-specific: Flatiron, Ontada, MM20, OMS - uncommon in cohort. Ochsner Health 4,700-clinician Epic deployment implies bidirectional production integration - https://www.deepscribe.ai/resources/ochsner-health-selects-deepscribe-to-bring-ambient-ai-to-their-4-700-clinicians. Gap to 4/4: Cerner / Oracle Health not named; Epic embed level (Toolbox / Hyperdrive / Haiku) not documented; no published FHIR resource list. (deepscribe.md §Dimension 5)
Workflow fit + clinician burden reduction 4/4 15 15.00 [VENDOR-CLAIMED] 99.92% note satisfaction; "85% of clinicians choose DeepScribe"; charts closed within 1.6 minutes; documentation time reduced 75%; 2-3 hours saved per clinician per day; +2 patients/day capacity - https://www.deepscribe.ai/, https://www.deepscribe.ai/about, https://www.ehrsource.com/articles/ambient-ai-scribes-comparison/. KLAS 98.8 + Real-Time generation + SmartPrep + Customization Studio is the strongest multi-surface workflow story in the mid-cohort. (deepscribe.md §Dimension 7)
Compliance + PHI posture 3/4 15 11.25 [VENDOR-CLAIMED] HIPAA-compliant (all employees certified), SOC 2 certified, AES-256 end-to-end encryption, PII-stripping methodology - https://www.deepscribe.ai/trustandsafety, https://www.keragon.com/hipaa/hipaa-compliant-checker/deepscribe. [UNKNOWN] HITRUST CSF status, ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type (Type I vs Type II), enumerated sub-processor list, PHI-residency commitment, model-training opt-out default. Trust portal at trust.deepscribe.ai exists but did not render content via WebFetch on 2026-05-23. Gap to 4/4: HITRUST CSF + sub-processor disclosure + SOC 2 Type II confirmation. (deepscribe.md §Dimension 2)
Ease of data integration + accuracy 3/4 25 18.75 [Sub-A 3/4] Epic + Athena + eClinicalWorks + oncology-specific (Flatiron, Ontada, MM20, OMS) named. No Cerner / Meditech / NextGen / Allscripts named. No published FHIR resource list - https://www.deepscribe.ai/. [Sub-B 3/4] Proprietary HealAI trained on 3M+ labeled clinical conversations; GPT-4 used as adjunct; +59% vs GPT-4 on vendor-internal benchmark - https://www.deepscribe.ai/resources/deepscribe-outperforms-gpt-4-by-59-percent-on-ai-medical-scribing. [UNKNOWN] MedQA / MedHELM / MedBench scores; routing logic between HealAI and GPT-4. (deepscribe.md §Dimension 4)
Cost economics 3/4 5 3.75 [THIRD-PARTY ESTIMATE] $350-$750/provider/month range, mid-band ~$500 with EHR integration - https://softwarefinder.com/emr-software/deepscribe/pricing, https://www.healos.ai/blog/deepscribe-pricing-features-cost-and-the-best-alternatives-in-2025. Modeled mid-band ~$4,800-$6,000/provider/year. Below Suki ($299-$399/mo) at the upper band but no published volume-discount schedule and no independently validated $/clinician/yr ROI figure equivalent to Ambience's KLAS-validated $13,049. (deepscribe.md §Dimension 3)
Time-to-value 3/4 5 3.75 [VENDOR-CLAIMED] Charts closed within 1.6 minutes; documentation time decreased 75%; 1,500+ healthcare organizations live on Ambient OS - https://www.ehrsource.com/articles/ambient-ai-scribes-comparison/, https://www.deepscribe.ai/about. [UNKNOWN] First-clinician-live SLA from contract signature; pilot duration norms; 250-clinician deployment timeline. (deepscribe.md §Dimension 6)
Total 100 78.75

Pricing detail

No public pricing page. All contracts are sales-led. Bands below are [THIRD-PARTY ESTIMATE] from independent industry analyses cross-referenced where possible.

Modeled annual cost (Yardstick estimate, $500/provider/month midpoint, before volume discount):

Sits roughly between Ambience (~$2,800-$5,000/clinician/yr base-to-suite, sales-led) and Suki ($299-$399/provider/month) in the cohort.

Integrations

Integration penalty verdict: SOFT for Epic / Athena / eClinicalWorks buyers and for oncology-specific systems (Flatiron / Ontada). HARD for Cerner / Oracle Health, Meditech, NextGen, Allscripts/Veradigm buyers - DeepScribe is not deployable as a chart-integrated tool in those environments and must be marked excluded with the integration-mismatch reason rendered visibly per Yardstick methodology.

Scale penalty verdict: NONE. Ochsner 4,700-clinician deployment + USON/AON/OneOncology footprint + 2,800+ clinics & health systems served + ~5M oncology visits/year are production-scale signals across both enterprise and group-practice buyer sizes.

Editorial assessment

DeepScribe is the specialty-care-first ambient AI scribe in the healthcare clinical cohort. Where Ambience plays for enterprise IDN bake-offs and Abridge plays for KLAS volume + Epic-Kaiser scale, DeepScribe plays for oncology depth and complex-specialty tuning. The USON / AON / OneOncology / SCRI / CARTI roster plus ~3.1M projected annual cancer-care visits puts DeepScribe at the top of the cohort for oncology buyers. Ochsner Health's 4,700-clinician selection is the strongest enterprise validation point on file. KLAS 98.8 Spotlight + 99.92% vendor-reported note satisfaction + Real-Time generation + SmartPrep pre-visit + AI Coding gives DeepScribe a workflow-surface story at parity with cohort leaders on clinician experience.

Three bounded weak spots. First, no DeepScribe-specific peer-reviewed validation study - the cohort has them at the top (Nabla in JAMA Network Open via UCLA, UW Health/Abridge in NEJM AI, DAX in multiple journals) and DeepScribe leans on internal benchmarks (DeepScore, "+59% vs GPT-4"). A buyer's clinical-safety committee will note this. Second, no published hallucination rate. Third, EHR breadth is solid for ambulatory but absent on Cerner / Oracle Health, and the Epic embed level (Toolbox / Hyperdrive / Haiku) is not documented. Hospital InfoSec teams used to Ambience-level disclosure may flag the gap.

Funding-stage signal is the other watch item. Last public round was October 2023 ($24M Series B); peers raised an order of magnitude more in the same window (Ambience $243M Series C July 2025, Abridge $250M+ across 2024-2025). Either DeepScribe is capital-disciplined or undercapitalized - public data does not distinguish.

For an oncology network, a specialty group practice in cardiology / GI / neurology / urology, or an ambulatory health system on Epic, Athena, or eClinicalWorks that values specialty-tuned scribing + coding-integrated note generation, DeepScribe is on the short list. For an inpatient-CDI-heavy enterprise IDN, an academic medical center demanding peer-reviewed validation, or a Cerner / Meditech / NextGen / Allscripts shop, the cohort offers stronger options today.

Best for

Right-of-reply gaps

The following items are flagged [UNKNOWN] in the dossier and should be put to DeepScribe during the factcheck pipeline:

Sources

See full source list in the research dossier: content/vendor-research/deepscribe.md